U214-A TV

U214-A TV

result during approval progress. The other is to make adjustment as temperature fluctuate 20 degree. Stopwatch, minimum value 0.1 second, is used for measuring how long a certain volume medium discharge out of fuel dispenser so as to calculate its flow rate. Gradienter, precision being 0.05mm/m, measures the degree of level. Article III Indicating appraisal method and data processing Appraisal of fuel dispenser actually is an indicating access. Presently, cubage compare method is mostly used defining basic tolerance between the volumes flow over flow meter and in metal standard measurer. Diagram 6-2 is illustrated the fuel dispenser’s appraisal flow. 1: Check valve 2: Pump 3: Vapor separator 4: Flow meter 5: Indicating device 6: Hose 7: Nozzle 8: Standard measurer 9: Measurer 10: Switch & zeroing 11: Container 12: Motor 13: Tank 14: Filter net Diagram 6-2: Appraisal of fuel dispenser using metal standard measurer Preparation before appraisal Place metal standard measurer on the hard ground and adjust with gradienter. It also put on vehicle or other bracket, as long as not waving or vibration during appraisal progress. Metal standard measurer should be earthing- connected. It is suggested to connect the measurer to ground terminal of fuel dispenser, making them being same potential. Running-in and wet measurer. Putting indicator device at zero, open nozzle and observe oil indicator. Oil is transparent as there i fuel dispenser s no foam in it. If have foam or bubble oil would be feculent and opaque. If foam exists in oil for a long time, fuel dispenser would have trouble. Appraise again after solving failure. Close nozzle as measurer full of oil. Empty measurer in accordan fuel dispenser ce with relative method and time, and shut off bottom valve, putting measurer in preparation state. Appraisal procedure of indicating valve Set unit price; Adjust flow to the maximum Qmax; Wet measurer and place it according to regulation; Tune indicator finger to zero position; Infuse measurer as preset volume, measure outlet t fuel dispenser

2　　2.6 Role of top management within the quality management system ................................................. 3　　2.7 Documentation .................................................................................................................................... 4　　2.8 Evaluating quality management systems ......................................................................................... 4　　2.9 Continual improvement ...................................................................................................................... 5　　2.10 Role of statistical techniques ........................................................................................................... 6　　2.11 Quality management systems and other management system focuses ..................................... 6　　2.12 Relationship between quality management systems and excellence models ............................ 6　　3 Terms and definitions .......................................................................................................................... 6　　3.1 Terms relating to quality .................................................... fuel dispenser ................................................................. 7　　3.2 Terms relating to management .......................................................................................................... 8 fuel dispenser 　　3.3 Terms relating to organization ........................................................................................................... 9　　3.4 Terms relating to process and product ........................................................................................... fuel dispenser

easily but not too much, especially when others want their turn; do not interrupt; be courteous; deal seriously with serious matters and gracefully with lighter ones; never criticise people behind their backs; stick to subjects of general interest; do not talk about yourself; and, above all, never lose your temper. Probably only two cardinal rules were lacking from Cicero s list remember people s names, and be a good listener. Each of these pieces of advice also has a long pedigree. At a pinch you might trace the point about names back to Plato. Both found a persuasive modern advocate in Dale Carnegie, a teacher of public speaking who decided in 1936 that Americans needed educating more broadly in “the fine art of getting along� His book “How to Win Friends and Influence People�is still in print 70 years later and has sold 15m copies. To remember names, and to listen well, are two of Carnegie s “six ways to make people like you� The others are to become genuinely interested in other people; smile; talk in terms of the other person s interests; and make the other person feel important. Cicero s rules of conversation seem to have been fairly common across cultures as well as time, if varying in strictness. It might reasonably be said that Italians are more tolerant of interruption, Americans of contradiction and the English of formality, for example. These rules of conversation also intersect with those of poli fuel dispenser teness more generally, as formulated by two American linguists, Penelope Brown and Steven Levinson, the pioneers of “politeness theory� Courtesy counts The Brown and Levinson model says, roughly speaking, that Person A probably does not wan fuel dispenser t to be rude to Person B, but in the way of things, life may sometimes require Person A to contradict or intrude on Person B, and when that happens, Person A has a range of “politeness strategies�to draw on. There are four main possibilities, given in ascending order of politeness. The first is a “bald, on-record? fuel dispenser