U406 Breakaway
The U406 is designed to be installed on fuel dispensing hoses,and will separate when subjected to a designed pull force. The dual valves seat automatically, stopping the flow of fuel and limiting any fuel spillage, while protecting the dispensing equipment. For proper operation, the U406-A/B should be installed with a "straightening" hose with a minimum length of 9". U406-C/D should be installed with a minimum length of 12" .
Materials:
Body: Aluminum
Main Seals: Viton
Main Spring: stainless steel
Guide and poppet: POM
Protective Sleeve: PVC
Features:
Pull force- the U406 will break away with a pull force of 250 lbs ±5%, the U406 will break away with a pull force of 300 lbs±5%.
Certainty of operation- designed to be replaced after separation, instead of reassembled, to protect against reassembly errors.
Unique double-poppet design-features low pressure drop.
Flow rate: 0-60L/Min(3/4")
0-120L/Min(1")
Working pressure: 0.18Mpa
Low pressure drop- the integral check valve design allows for minimal pressure drop for faster, high-volume fill-ups.
100% Factory Tested.
Package:
Product ID Net Weight Cross Weight Sizet
U406-A 23kg/case of 100 26kg/case of 100 26.8x48x26 cm /case of 100
U406-B 23kg/case of 100 26kg/case of 100 26.8x48x26 cm /case of 100
U406-C 19kg/case of 50 22kg/case of 50 29x29x30 cm /case of 50
U406-D 19kg/case of 50 22kg/case of 50 29x29x30 cm /case of 50
we are committed to create the best workplace, encourage our staffs to put their own personalities into their jobs, and provide them a stage to show themselves.
to get rid of the bomb safely. All seem to
prefer to trade well-worn slogans.
Signs of seriousness might start with renewed attempts to tackle the
threats to peace and security that drive regional arms races. They would
also have to include efforts to work towards the creation of zones that
would be free of weapons of mass destruction. The Middle East and
South Asia would be two early candidates.
Work has been going on since the early 1990s to secure nuclear
materials in Russia and other ex-Soviet countries, but the effort would
need to be stepped up and extended worldwide. The attempts to block
illicit transfers of nuclear materials and technology would have to be intensified. Surplus weapons would need to be
dismantled more speedily. And some way would have to be found to reassure the have-nots that the haves were
reducing the role, as well a fuel dispenser s the numbers, of nuclear weapons in their defence policies.
Difficulties, and more difficulties
Even many a nuclear enthusiast would agree that such steps would make today s world safer. But much more
would be needed to make tomorrow s world safe for the much deeper cuts in nuclear weapons that might precede
their total abolition.
One idea for binding nuclear and non-nuclear states into a web of controls and reassurance is a Nuclear Weapons
Convention, along the lines of the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions, setting out progressive steps
towards an eventual ban. These would need to include obligations not to develop, test or produce new weapons; a
transitional moratorium on use; a timetable for dismantling weapons; an obligation on all states to prevent the
transfer of nuclear skills and materials; and a programme for converting or shutting down completely all weapons-
related facilities. As with UN Resolution 1540, which obliges governments to pass laws to prevent weapons of mass
destruction and related materials reaching terrorists, the rules would have to apply not just to states, but to
companies and individuals as well.
T fuel dispenser fuel dispenser
